Hello, everybody:
Shri said:
One advantage is the connections and some built in discounts with bulk purchases for the business.
A very good point. This is one of the strengths of the franchise or chain concept. Anyone considering opting in to a franchise should definitely consider this aspect before deciding to go it alone.
Kevin said:
...a good franchise in the proper location can translate into a license to print money... so why not?
I agree when it is a recognized (that is, popular) franchise and if the location is right - like a Tim Horton's in the downtown Toronto business district.
Where I think going it alone makes better sense is, for example, in my little town more than an hour from a major metropolis. Here, there isn't enough traffic to support the cost of a Tim Horton's franchise.
It might make sense for an investor looking to capitalize down the road a few years. They can set up and establish the business now, lock in the location, and be prepared for the growth that is inevitably coming to our neck of the northern Alberta woods. But for a businessperson who needs to make money now, a franchise of that magnitude might not make sense.
Why not put the franchise money into setting up a self-named, locally owned clone of the franchise store? And then, in a few years, the self-owned business will be established and might be able to scare off the franchise operation from entering the market.
Russell said:
I see it as a toss-up really... relating to different personality types. Some investors don't want to think about building their own 'system', and would prefer to hit the ground running at whatever the expense - read franchise fees, royalties, etc.
Finances and ability are factors, but I agree here with Russell: it comes down to the personal interests and goals of the individual. If you have talent, drive and vision as a business person, it isn't going to make any difference whether you buy into a franchise or go it alone - you will do whatever it takes to make it work.
GT
